|
back
to top
back
to top
back
to top
back
to top
back
to top
back
to top
back
to top
back
to top
back
to top
|
THE EDUCATOR - Spring 2002
Drug-Endangered Children
Abandoned and Forgotten
By Mitchel J. Brown and Sue Webber-Brown
The Problem
Every day in this country, you can see evidence of chil
dren being abandoned and forgotten as victims of the drug epidemic, particularly
methamphetamine. With metham phetamine come the additional dangers associated
with drug manufacturing. The laboratories are toxic time bombs that not
only contaminate our land and water, but our children. Children from a
drug user/dealer’s home face many perils, but there are additional hazards
faced by the child with a methamphetamine laboratory in or near their
home. The hazards faced by these children include:
• Inhalation of toxic fumes
• Skin or clothing contact with inappropriately stored chemicals
• Explosion/fire from lab
• Chemical waste dumped in play area
• Chemicals that are flammable, corrosive, poisonous, toxic, cancerous,
and generally inherently dangerous
•Hazardous lifestyle
•Neglect by caretaker (parents)
•Lack of essential food
•Inappropriate sleeping conditions Lack of medical/dental treatment
•Lack of supervision
•Lack of grooming
•Lack of support
•Lack of encouragement
•Lack of discipline
•Lack of guidance
•Accessibility to pornographic materials
•Victims of physical, emotional, and sexual abuse
•Accessibility to drugs, weapons, and booby traps
•Drug users, dealers, and manufacturers (not exactly great role models)
• At risk of being school dropout
• At risk of drug/alcohol abuse
• Future felons
• Long- and short-term health problems
• Death
The children’s only hope is that law enforcement takes
the first step by recognizing them as victims of crime that requires immediate
intervention to rescue them. By forming a multi-agency team, Drug Endangered
Children (DEC) Program, you will ensure that you’re part of a rescue
effort which will save thousands of children.
California’s Experience
In California, the proliferation of clandestine meth amphetamine
laboratories did not emerge until 1986. Between January 1986 and December
2000, approximately 10,000 clandestine drug laboratories (mostly methamphetamine)
were discovered by California law enforcement agencies. Drug law enforcement
officers in California have acted in addressing the manpower, training,
and economic requirements of combating the problem of detecting, seizing,
and prosecuting methamphetamine manufacturing cases. However, drug law
enforcement officers, in most instances, failed to recognize additional
victims in the drug wars—the children and the environment, who have become
recipients of contamination from clandestine methamphetamine laboratories.
All too often when drug enforcement officers incarcerate the parents of
minor children for the manufacturing of methamphetamine, the children
are dealt with in the most expedient manner. Generally, the children are
left with a relative or neighbor who can respond the quickest to relieve
the law enforcement officers of their child care (babysitting) duties.
However, this expedient manner fails to address the needs of the children.
Law enforcement must act now to adequately protect our
most cherished resources - our children and the environment they will
inherit. Clandestine methamphetamine laboratory sites and the hazardous
chemicals associated with them continue to be a rapidly growing problem
throughout the United States. They threaten the health of our children
by poisoning their bodies with toxic substances. These same toxic substances
contaminate our environment by getting into the air, ground, and water
supply. The law enforcement community and public health officials are
ill-prepared to address the environmental issues of hazards and/or toxic
wastes associated with clandestine methamphetamine laboratories. Methamphetamine
laboratory sites remain as toxic time bombs long after the laboratory
equipment and raw chemicals are removed. If someone wanted to clean up
the sites to allow for human inhabitants, no governmental standards exist
for remediation.
That is inexcusable. In September, 1995, an Agent with
the California Department of Justice Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement concluded
a two-year investigative report on “Child Endangerment and the Environmental
Health Hazards Caused by Methamphetamine Laboratories” which he used for
his Master’s thesis. His study examined Butte County’s DEC program. His
findings were that there was adequate evidence, and case law, which addresses
the extreme hazardous nature of a clandestine methamphetamine laboratory
and the chemicals associated with the manufacturing process. Further,
after the removal/dismantling of a clandestine methamphetamine laboratory,
the site upon which it stood is an extreme health risk. Persons who expose
their children to such a danger should be arrested and prosecuted for
felony child endangerment because such actions are “likely to produce
great bodily harm.” Currently, only 18 percent of children located at
clan destine methamphetamine sites are detained by law enforcement and/or
acted upon by child protective services. The study also found that when
law enforcement had an aggressive pro gram of removing the child from
a home that had a clandestine methamphetamine laboratory associated with
it, coupled with medical testing, 35 percent of the children tested positive
for methamphetamine. Based on additional preliminary results from Butte
County, they found that 10 percent of children re moved from a user/seller
house, tested positive for the presence of methamphetamine. Additionally,
the study found that there was a large amount of physical and sexual abuse
that occurred in meth homes. The first step in determining the needs of
children located at the clandestine meth amphetamine laboratory is for
law enforcement officers to have an established protocol with child
protective services and health officials. The exposure of children to
a clandestine methamphetamine laboratory site poses such a health risk,
that it is now recognized as a violation of child endangerment laws
in California. It hadn’t been so in years past.
The Victims
The methamphetamine epidemic has claimed countless children as its victims. One has to only view television or newspaper headlines
to see its effects.
• 15-month-old overdoses on methamphetamine, Rancho
Cordova, CA
• 5-month-old dies, an autopsy reveals methamphetamine in the infant’s
blood, twelve broken ribs, a burnt leg and scarred feet. All injuries
were inflicted by a methamphetamine addict. Los Angeles, CA
• 13-month-old dies of heart trauma, broken spleen and broken neck by
methamphetamine addict. She was also raped and sodomized. California
High Desert
• 25-month-old Oregon toddler overdoses on methamphetamine.
• 2-month-old dies of methamphetamine in system, San Jose, CA
• 2-year-old eats methamphetamine found in baby jar. Twenty-nine Palms,
CA
• 14-month-old drinks lye in water from parents’ methamphetamine lab.
Child is hospitalized with permanent damage to body. Fairfield, CA
• New baby dies from mother’s breast milk laced with methamphetamine.
Orange County, CA
• 8 week-old, 11-pound boy, dies from methamphetamine poisoning found
inside baby bottle. Orange County, CA
• 8-year-old watches and hears mom die in methamphetamine laboratory
fire. Oroville, CA
• 6-month-old overdoses, has seizures and is life flighted to hospital.
Mother administered methamphetamine in baby bottle to child. Oroville,
CA
• 4-year-old tests positive for methamphetamine. Child was beaten, hair
pulled out, and sexually abused by mom’s methamphetamine using boyfriend.
Chico, CA
• Eight children exposed to methamphetamine laboratory at day care center.
Southern CA
• Mom’s methamphetamine-addicted boyfriend drowns 2-year-old in bathtub.
Sacramento, CA
California’s Approach to
a Solution
In 1991, an Investigator with the Butte County District
Attorney’s Office, was as signed to a multi-agency narcotics task force
sponsored by the California Department of Justice. Over the course of
the next few years, the Investigator noticed that most law enforcement
officers would simply avoid assessing the needs of the child by allowing
the child to stay with a friend, neighbor, or relative. Many times this
is at the request of the parent, but it certainly has the endorsement
of the law enforcement officer. Out of sight, out of mind, on with the
business of narcotic enforcement. Not a very glamorous picture, but it
was a reality. Even more discouraging was the fact that child protective
services workers were encouraging law enforcement officers to find placement
for the children.
The Butte County DEC program established in 1993 is a
multi-agency, cooperative effort to ensure the safety and well being of
children endangered by drugs. Their goals are:
1. Rescue children from unsafe environments,
2. Improve the safety and health of drug or chemically exposed children
by providing appropriate services,
3. Hold parents accountable for their actions,
4. Improve the community response to these children,
5. Establish a consistent response from law enforcement and children’s
services division.
Remember, the parents as the primary caregivers, exposed
their child to the toxic chemicals associated with methamphetamine manufacturing,
as well as the parents’ lifestyle. Most manufacturers of drugs are also
users and sellers of the drug themselves. Additionally, one if not both
parents present at the laboratory site would be arrested and incarcerated
in jail for an undetermined amount of time for manufacturing drugs. If
that doesn’t appear reason enough to remove a child from the house hold,
consider that the clandestine methamphetamine laboratory site doubled
as the child’s home. A home which is a toxic waste site is uninhabitable
for human beings. Not exactly an environment to leave a child in with
friends, neighbors, or relatives. By the way, who do drug manufacturers,
dealers, and users associate with? If the answer is: with others within
the drug culture, then you have to have questions about the fitness of
those friends, neighbors, and relatives.
Where parents spread their criminal conduct into the lives
of their children, the parents’ conduct must be addressed as would any
other criminal conduct. Whether it is use, sales, or manufacturing, methamphetamine
destroys children’s lives, future, and health. To improve their chances,
intervention must occur.
An evaluation of the situation should seem clear by now.
The DEC program was established for the sole purpose of res cuing children
from drug homes.
In Butte County, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) exists
between Children Services Division (CSD), the Butte Interagency Narcotics
Task Force (BINTF), and the Butte County District Attorney’s Office. The
purpose of the MOU is to provide a cooperative effort between the above-mentioned
agencies to facilitate and coordinate a response to families involved
in drug manufacturing, sales, and possession when children are involved.
Based on the successes that Butte County encountered,
they took their model program to the Governor’s Office of Criminal Justice
Planning. After a year of meetings between professional disciplines,
a pilot project was started by the Governor’s Office, which ultimately
involved seven counties and the commitment of 3.1 million dollars over
a three-year period.
Success of Drug-Endangered
Children (DEC)
In Butte County, the successes of DEC have been measured
in a variety of ways:
6. The partnerships formed have greatly enhanced each
agency’s/discipline’s efficiency and effectiveness, thereby improving
the quality of service and life;
7. Enhanced all agencies’ working relationships outside of DEC;
8. Early detection of children at risk has allowed for proper treatment
and intervention for the children;
9. Drug enforcement teams have made cases involving children their top
priority;
10. DEC has worked 351 investigations in which 742 children were rescued;
11. The DEC team has made 250 presentations to 7,000 persons from a
wide variety of disciplines;
12. Other counties and states are starting DEC programs;
13. Higher conviction rates in drug cases involving children. Twelve
other counties in Califor nia and a few other states have em barked
on Drug Endangered Children programs modeled aftei the Butte Pilot project.
Availability of Training
and Other Resources
Today in California, with the assistance of the Governor’
Office of Criminal Justice Planning (OCJP), they formed an advisory committee
on Child Endangerment in Clandestine Drug Labs. As a result of the efforts
and recommendations of this committee, OCJP has funded a study that includes
element from law enforcement, social services, and the District Attorney’s
Office that addresses the needs of the victims associated with the manufacturing
of methamphetamine. Additionally, a guidebook “Multi-Agency Partnerships:
Linking Drugs with Child Endangerment” was developed. The guidebook pr vides
critical drug enforcement protocol for those professionals working every
day to protect the safety and well being our children.
The guidebook addresses the following:
14. The problem of clandestine labs;
15. Drug Endangered Children:
16. Overview of the systems that respond to clandestine laboratories;
17. Law enforcement investigations;
18. The public safety response;
19. The child protection system;
20. Prosecuting child endangerment;
21. Medical evaluation;
22. The multi-disciplinary team approach;
23. Policy implications and questions for further study.
The guidebook also contains examples of memorandums of
understanding, sample DEC reports, clandestine drug lab chemical checklist,
testing for drug-exposed children protocol, safe work practices, and operational
agreements. The guide book may be obtained by contacting the California
Governor’s Office of Criminal Justice Planning, 1130 K Street, Suite 300,
Sacramento, California 95814, or by calling (916) 324-9100.
Additionally, California has established a network of trainers who instruct on the Drug Endangered Children program.
Conclusion
Every discipline involved in identifying and helping
children at risk should be involved in a DEC program. It’s the legal and
moral thing to do. Please start your DEC program today.
About the Authors
Chief Mitchel J. Brown, Oroville, California, is a 30-year law enforcement
veteran. He is the former Assistant Chief of the California Department
of Justice/Bureau Narcotic Enforcement and instructor/lecturer for the
Drug Endangered Children program for the past six years. He wrote his
Master's Thesis on “Child Endangerment and Environmental Health Hazards
Caused by Clandestine Methamphetamine Laboratories.” He sits on many Drug
Endangered Children advisory boards, and as a Child’s Victim Advocate,
he has received two State awards for his work with the DEC program.
Investigator Sue Webber-Brown, Butte County District
Attorney’s Office, is an 18-year law enforcement veteran. For the past
ten years, she has been assigned as a Detective to the Butte Interagency
Narcotics Task Force. She is responsible for the investigation of major
narcotic cases and child endangerment. She successfully developed and
implemented Butte County’s Drug Endangered Children program, the first
of its kind in the country. She has also co-authored a training guide
on DEC, is a nationally recognized DEC expert and guest lecturer across
the nation. She has been the recipient of numerous local, state and national
awards for her work in the Drug-Endangered Children program.
|